Research on Intelligent Design

To put together scientific advances from the perspective of Intelligent Design.

Friday, August 01, 2008

A GREAT CRYPTANALYST HAS DIED

William (Bill) Reed
(1929-2008)

http://www.beatricedailysun.com/articles/2008/08/16/obituaries/doc48a5949f0954b041865802.txt

We are saddened to inform you that on July 30th William (Bill) Reed had died at his 79 years old.

"I finally found the Soviet submarines. It happened by accident. I had been hearing a “scratchy” sound for some time on various monitored circuits, but had passed it over as some kind of an anomaly, a spurious emission ... whatever. It was sort of like a burst of static ... but not quite. Then, one day, I made a sonograph-enlarged picture of a standard Soviet signal which happened to have one of these scratchy sounds almost on top of it. I spread it out and took a closer look. I’ll be damned! It had bauds! Tiny bauds, the most compressed signal that I had ever encountered ... but bauds. It was a man-made signal, and it obviously was not one of ours. Gotcha! It was a burst signal, and it had to be a Russian sub. We fired the recording directly to the National Security Agency, and they were ecstatic!"
Bill Reed.
IN MEMORIAM:

“Bill Reed’s Rocks and Shoals …chronicles his beginnings as a dirt-poor kid saddled with an abusive step-father, yet a boy who later rose to such a prominent position with U.S. Naval Intelligence that he was given the enormously important job of briefing President John F. Kennedy during the Cuban Missile Crisis—a predicament a thousand times more dangerous than the more recently trumped-up “imminent danger” posed by Iraq.

However, thanks to a secret new defense system which could track Soviet submarines in the Caribbean (CODEWORD: BORESIGHT)—and whose efficacy Reed was able to “sell” to JFK—America managed to avoid a potential nuclear conflict without having to shed the blood of a single human being. (Anyone listening in Washington?)

Throughout a life that unreels like a fascinating novel, Reed emerges as a quintessential American, yet one sublimely aware that duty to country should always come second to loyalty to conscience.”

Alejandro Grattan, Chief Editor El Ojo del Lago, Chapala, Jalisco, Mexico.
[Broken link: http://www.garcesbooks.com]

HOW THE SHADOW GOVERNMENT’S U.S. “INTELLIGENCE” PAYS BACK TO THE U.S.A. PATRIOTS

Chapter Eleven

Crucifixion and Resurrection
p. 221-234
“…She (Joyce, then Bill’s wife) went to her bedroom. I made a pallet on the floor. I was emotionally, mentally and physically exhausted, but I couldn’t sleep. I could never seem to be able to sleep lately. Perhaps sleeping pills would help? I found some in the bathroom and took a few. Nothing. Ten minutes later I took some more, and finally become drowsy. It occurred to me that perhaps I had taken too many. Who cares? The world would probably be better off without me. I fell asleep.”

And the telephone rang. It had probably been ringing for some time. I came out of it slowly. I looked at my watch. I had been asleep only some ten minutes. I felt awful. I remember thinking, Alcohol and Guilting is a Killer! Then, Don’t Guilt while Drinking! Somehow that struck me as funny. It was the first thing that I had thought funny for a long time. I answered the phone. It was Pat Webb.

Pat said, “Hey, Man! We’ve been calling all over town trying to find you. Come on over. We need you!”
“What do you mean, you need me?”
“We’re in trouble. No money. No job. Can’t pay the rent. Lot’s of problems. I need a friend, Man. Come on over. We’ve got to talk.”
I said, “Okay, Pat. I’ll be there in half an hour. I’ll bring a bottle.”
Pat said, “Well, that sounds good, but as long as you’re going to the store, could you also bring some food? We haven’t eaten in a week!”
“Sure”

“…I was walking down a corridor in the NSA (National Security Agency) building thinking… everything is going to be just… and I collapsed.”

“… They took me to the NSA dispensary. The doctor examined me, and then asked, “Have you taken any medicines lately? Any pills?”
Without thinking of the consequences, I replied,
“Yes, sleeping pills.”
“How many?”
“To tell you the truth, I don’t remember”
That did it. From that moment on, my fate was sealed… Attached to the doctor’s admission request was a flag “possible suicide attempt.”
“…Whether it was proven suicide attempt or not. I knew that my career in Intelligence work was over. The NSA never took chances. I would never again be trusted with a Top Secret CODEWORD security clearance. And without that, I was out of the spook business.”

“…but the question of my loyalty had to be raised: What had prompted a Golden Boy candidate like Reed, a man practically assured of achieving senior rank, to want to take his life? Guilt? Guilt over what?”
“…Could he be a double agent? Was he possibly a plant? He had volunteered for this work, remember? He hadn’t been selected at random from prior-screened candidates as was the normal route to intelligence work. Damn! We could have been set up; and this sonofabitch knows where the family jewels are stashed!”
“A full-scale investigation into my background was ordered. No stone was to be left unturned… I had completely blanked from my memory the name of the bastard who was assigned over-all responsibility for my investigation, but we have to call him something. “Jones” will do…”
“… The first thing I discovered when I returned to the B.O.Q. (Bachelor Officers Quarters) was the fact that they had entered my quarters and ransacked the place for evidence against me.”

“…Then they proceeded to interrogate everyone I had ever known or communicated with… kindergarten teacher on up. They missed surprisingly few. I began to receive calls from friends all over the world:
What’s your problem?
Are you in bad trouble?
The guy said I wasn’t to tell anyone that he had talked with me. He said the security of the nation was involved. Damn, Reed! What have you done?”
I guess they really worked over poor Olga in Norway; and every other female liaison whose address I had been foolish enough to record. They had photographed everything…”

“… I was being followed, or stalked out, 24-hours a day, day in and day out. I noticed two men parked outside the B.O.Q. entranceway every night, motor running to keep the heater going. I knew they were there to keep tabs on me. Who else? Then I began to observe tail cars on my trips between Fort Meade and Bethesda. I was still on outpatient status and required to check in several times a week to ensure that I wasn’t a backslider.
I started to tabulate the number of cars assigned to me: one, two, three, and four…
At first the changeovers were professional, made at random. But then, as I knew they would, they became conditioned, casual. After almost a month of this, they became sloppy and fell into a routine that made their job easier…”

“I was so cooperative that I went outside and talked with the agents in the night car assigned to me. They wanted no part of that at first, but I finally convinced them that my intentions were pacific… Slowly, over a period of time, I began to gain their confidence, and some sympathy for my situation. Like my day keepers, they began to relax, and view me as an easy target… They had my wife’s apartment stalked out also. She had undergone intensive interrogation, and so had my children. Agents had even followed Pamela and Billy to school, and talked with their teachers. This was too much. I wasn’t angry; I was furious. I wouldn’t be pushed any further.”

“I had given some eighteen years of my life to my country, serving in the best and most conscientious manner of which I was capable… As a reward an agency of my government was treating me as a man already found guilty of some heinous crime, and that implied guilt was rubbing off on my friends and family…”

“…I had noticed that there were a few moments after I made that sharp curve, where I usually lost sight of my tail. My speed had always remained constant, but one morning as I made the curve I speeded up, then turned abruptly in at the back entrance. As I suspected, a puzzled caravan of searchers sailed on by towards the Main Gate… I drove to an alternate out-of-the-way parking lot, took out a pre-packed bag containing extra uniforms, civilian clothing, and everything else that I would need for a week vacation… I walked a roundabout path to the main gate. I was by this time in dress-white uniform. The Marine guard saluted me smartly. I stepped to the bus stop and caught the first bus going anywhere. I just wanted to get out of sight…”

“…the harassment continued: surveillance, parked cars overnight, the tailing. Now they were even following Joyce and the children to the grocery store!”
“… I was sent to be questioned by the first team: CIA H.Q., Langley. I took the polygraph, and was transferred shortly thereafter to an unclassified desk at the Pentagon…”
“One day as I parked in the Pentagon lot, I saw a young agent get out of a tail car and follow me into the building. I waited on a stairway. As he came hurrying along I stepped out from a corner and stopped him with a hand on his chest. I said, “Okay, kid. You want to follow me? Here, take my hand and I’ll lead you to my desk.” The kid came unglued. He stuttered.
“What… who are you? Are you some kind of queer… or somethin’?...” Then he turned and ran back down the stairway. The next day I was re-admitted to Bethesda Hospital…”
“It was obvious that I had been re-admitted to Bethesda just to get me off the street. I was an embarrassment to them. Why couldn’t I slink around looking guilty and frightened like any normal suspect? …”

“…I awaited the verdict from what looked like a hung jury. Somebody (probably Mr. Jones) didn’t want to give up. I had to be guilty of something! CIA once more for polygraphs, more waiting…”
“…On the way out I was stopped by Mr. Jones. He said,
“Lieutenant, you are either the cleanest sonofabitch I’ve ever encountered or the smartest criminal. Whatever the case, I don’t want you to relax too much; I’ll be looking over your shoulder from time to time.”
I replied, “I suppose I can’t prevent that, Mr. Jones, but I will make you a promise. If you ever molest my family again, especially my children, I’m going to look you up, personally. I’ll even do better than that. I’ll take this public. Regardless of what happens to me, I will reveal things that you and your agency have done that I suspect won’t help your career at all. A competent investigator would have cleared me in two weeks, without recourse to harassment. I will embarrass you, and a great many people. Think about that. Don’t relax too much.”

p. 250-251
The Ubiquitous “Jones Boys”
“Yeah, the bastards were still at it. I was sitting in my office at the 32nd St. Naval Station one morning, when I was advised that I had two visitors from that organization (the ONI, “Office of Naval Intelligence”) who wished to speak with me in private. I recognized them as soon as they stepped through the door. Jones’ Boys – or imitations thereof from some other Spook organization. The interview, or rather interrogation, followed the usual lines…
After that interview I had little illusions as to continuing my career in the Real Navy. Nor did I wish to do so. I put in my papers.”

p. 258
“…The Jones Boys were still on my tail. Unnoticed visits to my modest beach house in Rosarito:
Have you had any relationships with “suspect” characters in your “defection” to South of the Border?
Why did you move to Mexico so suddenly?
Have you been contacted by anyone asking questions regarding your work at NSA?
I’m afraid that I wasn’t all that cooperative. I offered them frijoles, tortillas and tequila, but to every other question I simply grinned broadly and asked, “What do you think?”
This really was the last straw. I decided to move further south… bought a beefed-up Buick to pull my house trailer and headed for the “badlands” of Mexico. If the ONI spooks wanted to follow me, fine, but I sure as hell wasn’t going to make it easy on them.”
“I simply could not believe that these idiots still suspected that I was a Soviet agent, or at least a turncoat. If I had been so, I would not be living in an old beat-up trailer in Mexico and drinking cheap tequila… Couldn’t these dumb bastards figure that one out?”

“I was furious! I decided to get as far away as possible. I needed a vacation. I took it, in Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, and it has lasted some thirty-three years.”
“In closing I only want to say that the United States Navy has been good to me. Forget the NSA, CIA and the ONI; they don’t know the difference between a rope, a line, a hawser or a shoestring. And if they ever knew the words Integrity, Service and Honor, they have surely forgotten them completely.”
--------------------------------
Bruce Ivins, another current victim of the "intelligence's stupidity"? (Manipulated by the "Shadow Government", the same one that "planted" faked evidence on 9/11, being the worst fake the TV Fakery of fake "planes" hitting WTC1 and WTC2)
"Ivins' lawyer says his client was totally innocent and that he killed himself because of the FBI's harassment. He was receiving psychotherapy in the weeks before his death and was banned from the premises of his research lab. Yesterday, a spokesperson for Ivins' lab, the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases at Fort Detrick said the agency "mourns the loss of Dr. Bruce Ivins, who served the institute for more than 35 years as a civilian microbiologist." That seems like an unusual thing to say if you believe one of your employees had something to do with an anthrax attack."
Links:
Also:
On Tuesday, August 05, 2008 the Associated Press wrote:
“In the current case, Ivins complained privately that FBI agents had offered his son, Andy, $2.5 million, plus "the sports car of his choice" late last year if he would turn over evidence implicating his father in the anthrax attacks, according to a former U.S. scientist who described himself as a friend of Ivins.”
The initial wording also includes the next:
“Army scientist Bruce Ivins told friends that government agents had stalked him and his family for months, offered his son $2.5 million to rat him out and tried to turn his hospitalized daughter against him with photographs of dead anthrax victims.
The pressure on Ivins was extreme, a high-risk strategy that has failed the FBI before.”
Then it continues:
“Ivins also said the FBI confronted Ivins' daughter, Amanda, with photographs of victims of the anthrax attacks and told her, "This is what your father did," according to the scientist, who spoke only on condition of anonymity because their conversation was confidential.
The scientist said Ivins was angered by the FBI's alleged actions, which he said included following Ivins' family on shopping trips.”
“The FBI declined to describe its investigative techniques of Ivins.
FBI official John Miller said that "what we have seen over the past few days has been a mix of improper disclosures of partial information mixed with inaccurate information and then drawn into unfounded conclusions. None of that serves the victims, their families or the public."”
“It is unclear how the FBI eliminated as suspects others in the lab who had access to the anthrax. It's not clear what, if any, evidence bolsters the theory that the attacks may have been a twisted effort to test a cure for the toxin. Investigators also can't place Ivins in Princeton, N.J., when the letters were mailed from a mailbox there.”
“Richard Schuler, attorney for anthrax victim Robert Stevens' widow, Maureen Stevens, said his client will attend Wednesday's FBI briefing with a list of questions.
"No. 1 is, 'Did Bruce Ivins mail the anthrax that killed Robert Stevens?"' Schuler said, adding, "I've got healthy skepticism."”
Another magazine (The New York Times) wrote:
"Dr. Ivins, a 62-year-old father of two, took an overdose of Tylenol with codeine."
“A lawyer who had represented Dr. Ivins since May 2007, Paul F. Kemp, insisted that Dr. Ivins was innocent and had been driven to suicide by false suspicions… Mr. Kemp said in a written statement, calling the microbiologist “a world-renowned and highly decorated scientist who served his country for over 33 years with the Department of the Army.”
“We assert his innocence in these killings and would have established that at trial,” Mr. Kemp said. “The relentless pressure of accusation and innuendo takes its toll in different ways on different people, as has already been seen in this investigation.””
“Scientists familiar with germ warfare said there was no evidence that Dr. Ivins, though a vaccine expert with easy access to the most dangerous forms of anthrax, had the skills to turn the pathogen into an inhalable powder.
“I don’t think a vaccine specialist could do it,” said Dr. Alan P. Zelicoff, a physician who aided the F.B.I. investigation when he worked at the Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque.
“This is aerosol physics, not biology,” Dr. Zelicoff added. “There are very few people who have their feet in both camps.””
“Representative Rush Holt, a Democrat whose district includes the Princeton, N.J., mailbox where investigators believe the letters were mailed, said the F.B.I. should provide a full briefing.
“What we learn,” Mr. Holt said, “will not change the fact that this has been a poorly handled investigation that has lasted six years and already has resulted in a trail of embarrassment and personal tragedy.””
Another Anthrax links:

Friday, June 02, 2006

Links to the Biggest Forensics Thus Far

I was told that Intelligent Design was very useful, not only to understand the probabilistic aspects of detecting design in nature, but also to study aspects related to the Science of Forensics. For that reason, and given the fact that the biggest forensics thus far has been the tragic events of September 11, 2001, I advance some links with the purpose of IDing the hand behind the whole operation:

Plane Deceit at the World Trade Center, Morgan Reynolds, July 18, 2008 (pdf).

http://www.pumpitout.com/

DEW Sponsors and Contractors

911 Skies

http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/audio/911

youtube.com (related videos)

youtube.com (related videos part 2)

youtube.com (related videos part 3)

September Clues #1 - The 911 Newsmedia Coverage [1 of 8]

911 Amateur Part 2

South Tower Anomalies III

911 Octopus 8: Media Perps Unmasked

Phone Call to NTSB regarding AA77 Flight Data Recorder

http://killtown.911review.org/2nd-hit.html

White Jet Analysis.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNU6xUuvgQc (genghis6199 "2001, A Fake Odyssey")

More videos

http://how911wasdone.com

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1KhSqArVyg

http://the911mysteryplane.com/

More on the C-20 Gulfstream

Etc..., etc..., etc....

We hope the issue at hand be sooner or later resolved.

Links in Spanish:

http://cronicas11s.lacoctelera.net

http://www.youtube.com/user/JonaylaCronicas11S

http://epicentroinformacion.blogspot.com/2008/03/doctor-d-rocha-pseudnimo.html

Thursday, May 18, 2006

Detecting Intelligent Design in Charred Ashes and in a Petrified Boat

The Research of Ron Wyatt:

Sodom & Gomorrah 45 minute amazing video (these videos are not so clear):
http://www.pilgrimpromo.com/WAR/realvideo/fullsodom.ram

Detecting the amazing shapes still preserved of Ziggurats, Walls, Statues and housings as well as the Sulfur rain that reduced everything to Ashes and the actual location of the five Cities of the Plain, including Sodom & Gomorrah, narrated by his loving wife (who narrates his other videos as well).

Noah's ark video:

Detecting the pattern of metals in the Ark's Design:
http://www.pilgrimpromo.com/WAR/realvideo/fullnoah2.ram

Beginning the story of the Ark:
http://www.pilgrimpromo.com/WAR/realvideo/fullnoah1.ram

Trees before the flood lacked rings due to an uniform climate and to a constant humidity in the form of vapor. The seasons and the alternate rain and drought started until after the flood. Never rained before the flood.

Index of Wyatt's Articles:
http://www.wyattnewsletters.com/indexartcls.htm

To see more of his videos:
http://www.arkdiscovery.com/listen.htm

Wyatt's critics are as vain as that 13th tribe Khazar that does not even believe in the actual existence of Mount Sinai and only goes by titles and degrees, or the vain criticism of that other money lover lost in the snow (I'm talking about Jammal's dupe, Dr. Morris Jr.):

http://www.tentmaker.org/WAR/Zias.html

You can also enjoy his movie on the Exodus and a tour to his museum by one of his close associates in the next index:

http://www.pilgrimpromo.com/WAR/realvideo/html/index.htm

Monday, May 01, 2006

The Deception of Aaron J. W. Hsueh: Exaggerating Darwin in Molecular Biology

Thanks to Robert Crowther for his enlightening article entitled:
The Role of Evolution in Biomedical Research is Highly Exaggerated

To complement Crowther's very interesting article (important to read Crowther's article first in order to understand this one), excerpts from the next and most recent article, destroys even further all of that Hsueh's Darwinian bluff:

Pan W, Tu H, Kastin AJ. Differential BBB interactions of three ingestive peptides: Obestatin, ghrelin, and adiponectin. Peptides. 2006 Apr;27(4):911-6 (PDF).
Endogenous compounds, including ingestive peptides, can interact with the blood-brain barrier (BBB) in different ways. Here we used in vivo and in vitro techniques to examine the BBB permeation of the newly described satiety peptide obestatin. The fate of obestatin in blood and at the BBB was contrasted with that of adiponectin. By the sensitive multiple time-regression method, obestatin appeared to have an extremely fast influx rate to the brain whereas adiponectin did not cross the BBB. HPLC analysis, however, showed the obestatin result to be spurious, reflecting rapid degradation. Absence of BBB permeation by obestatin and adiponectin was in contrast to the saturable transport of human ghrelin reported previously. As a positive control, ghrelin showed saturable binding and endocytosis in RBE4 cerebral microvessel endothelial cells. By comparison, obestatin lacked specific binding and endocytosis, and the small amount internalized showed rapid intracellular degradation before the radioactivity was released by exocytosis. The differential interactions of obestatin, adiponectin, and ghrelin with the BBB illustrate their distinctive physiological interactions with the CNS.

Obestatin has an effect in reducing food intake no greater than that of urocortin...

When the stability of the peptide was further tested by HPLC, it was shown that most of the 125I-obestatin was degraded to smaller peptide fragments 10 min after i.v. injection into the circulation (only 14.2% of the total radioactivity recovered 10 min after i.v. injection (A [in the figure]), and nearly 0 at 20 min (B[in the figure]))

...in mice that obestatin is rapidly degraded and does not have specific uptake by the endothelial cells composing the BBB.

In summary, neither obestatin nor adiponectin crosses the BBB by a specific transport system. Obestatin was rapidly degraded in the circulation, but adiponectin was very stable.

Human ghrelin exhibited saturable binding and endocytosis in the RBE4 rat cerebral microvessel endothelial cell line...
So, is currently Hsueh himself promoting this, his own pro-Darwinian study on "obestatin" in his own website? ABSOLUTELY NOT! (check that his last main reference updated is for 2006, while his "Darwinian" paper (from 2005) and other of his Darwinian papers, are not even included within his main papers or within his main description of his "research interests") Why? Does Hsueh secretly recognize that it is extremely bogus to credit and to equate the liar Darwin's ideological frauds with comparative genomics and with molecular biology?

Here is the full PDF of such Hsueh paper, paper overinflated by Hsueh's press conferences as "confirming" the absurdities of "Darwinism"; however, the "more subdued" original version of the paper, as Crowther wrote, indirectly and only passing-by mentions "evolution" (that when real can be understood as "microevolution"), but not as "Darwinism", and here, not even for the main molecule of the paper (obestatin) but for two receptors, and that, as usual, mentioned only as a sheer speculation linked to the fine-tuning of the molecules, see it by yourself in Hsueh's next paragraph:
"Our discovery that obestatin is the cognate ligand for GPR39 suggests that GHSR and GPR39 could have evolved from a common ancestor but diverged in their functions, thus maintaining a delicate balance of body-weight regulation. This scenario is similar to the divergent and sometimes opposing actions of two paralogous corticotropin-releasing hormone receptors and their ligands in the regulation of adaptive stress responses"
Hsueh also mentions "evolution" (that can be understood as "microevolution") once and again, mere speculation, in the legend for a figure on his supplementary material (also in PDF) for this same paper:
"Bioinformatic prediction of conserved obestatin. Based on a computer program previously used to identify unique protein signatures (6), we searched for potential mono- or dibasic cleavage sites in ~200 known preprohormone sequences. Candidate regions were further checked for evolutionary conservation of the putative mature regions in diverse species."
How can Hsueh be so biased and erroneous to fraudulently equate, as most of the atheists within the scientific community do, "microevolution" with the lies of Darwin?

Well, let's see the roots of his deliberate deception, covered here in this blog elsewhere ("The Finch Variation") and demonstrated by a Hsueh's seminar in China:

http://news.ioz.ac.cn/2004/1/FA445971_13DF_496A_951C_376F1F18E20F.html

And even when the main text is in Chinese, you can easily appreciate that in the first slide, where one Chinese student is reading, that the slide at his back reads: "Evolutionary Genomics of Polypeptides, Ligands and Receptors" (again this, when true, can be easily understood as "microevolution", but never as a Darwinian "macroevolution"), then in the next figure we can see Hsueh gesturing and in the third figure finally we have the Darwinian deception, yes, again and again, by the deceptive use of the Galapagos' finches (here is the deceptive and always used "example" of Darwinism directly from that Chinese webpage):So, we see that time after time the atheistic deception of Darwinists is to deliberately blur and confound the clear difference between compatible varieties of animals, exactly like those finches, with the wrong idea of the false "new" origin of genetically incompatible new "species".

The rest of the slides of that Chinese website show different approaches of a deceived audience. That conference was presented by Hsueh in China in January of 2004, while on December 23, and again in China, while others were celebrating their holidays, Hsueh presented the next conference, again and wrongfully pushing his biased "Darwinism" in China, to the extreme "Darwinism in the post-genomic era"

And then again, a biased article by the same Hsueh was published in Chinese:
Aaron J. W. Hsueh. Introduction to evolutionary genomics. Acta Zoologica Sinica. 2004. 50(5):856-8.
"Abstract: Recent advances in the sequencing of all genes in human and diverse model organism have provided a new perspective on biological research. Comparison of the sequences of orthologous and paralogous genes based on their evolutionary origins allows a better understanding of the physiological roles of individual genes. One of the most important aspectsof genomic research is the understanding of the entire gene repertoire, thus eventually allowing a full understanding of gene functions. This article provides some examples of comparative genomic analyses of polypeptide ligands and their receptors. The Chinese name for the emerging field of "evolutionary genomics" – is proposed here in order to emphasize the non progressive nature of the evolutionary process and the global analyses of the complete gene sets in diverse organisms. Key words: Evolution, Genomics."
Here, the calculated deception of Hsueh consists in that his use of the word "evolution" (to support his atheistic Darwinism, as we have seen here) is coupled with the NON-EVOLUTION that we have observed in Molecular Biology, which means that the Conserved Sequences, according to Hsueh's own words, "emphasize the non progressive nature". So, if the nature of the conserved sequences is non progresive that means that they remain stable, under STASIS, performing the very same function in every organism which contains them! The minor variations within the different groups of organisms containing those very similar and conserved secuences can be accounted in terms of 'MICROEVOLUTION' but never in the atheistic fashion envisioned by Darwin (Darwin's linear idea of a never-planned, purposeless and non-directed Universe, which is Darwin's speculation of a false "macroevolution"). So, "the non progressive nature" of the stasis within the Conserved Sequences in Molecular Biology is indeed an intelligent design!

Other papers in which Hsueh mentions the word "evolution" (that can be easily understood, when real, as with the evident diversity of compatible finches, again, as "microevolution"), are:

Orna Avsian-Kretchmer and Aaron J. W. Hsueh. Comparative Genomic Analysis of the Eight-Membered Ring Cystine Knot-Containing Bone Morphogenetic Protein Antagonists. Molecular Endocrinology 18 (1): 1-12.
"Availability of completed genome sequences from diverse organisms allows bioinformatic analysis of the evolution of BMP antagonists and facilitates their classification."
However a related paper by the same author does not mention evolution in its abstract at all!!! (And that is because "evolution" is not necessary at all to do good science):

A J W Hsueh, P Bouchard1 and I Ben-Shlomo. Hormonology: a genomic perspective on hormonal research. Journal of Endocrinology (2005) 187, 333-338.
"Recent advances in comparative genomics allow a new paradigm for hormonal research. At the centennial of the first use of the term hormone by Ernest Starling, we reflected on the changing approaches in elucidating hormonal signaling mechanisms and highlighted the inadequacy of the term endocrinology, implying remote activation, to describe the diverse modes of hormone actions. Several examples were presented to underscore the power of comparative genomics in the identification of new polypeptide hormones, receptors, and signaling pathways. We propose the use of the term hormonology to more accurately reflect the expanding boundaries of the discipline."
Note: Did here, in this previous abstract Hsueh forgot to do his "ideologico-political" statement or what? (smile) What is clear is that in his own words, the use of "evolution" it is not useful to do good and practical science after all!

Early comments on the molecule itself used by Hsueh in his "Darwinian" press conferences (obestatin), can be seen at:
http://onhealth.webmd.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=56358
"...there's not much change in body weight, and we don't yet know if fat mass is actually changed... Obestatin may have cut appetite by making the rats "a little sick and therefore a little bit less willing to eat," Tschop [Matthias Tschop, MD] says... Tschop says there are dozens of hormones involved in appetite and probably even hundreds of factors that are known to play a role in energy balance, food intake, body weight, and body composition. "We don't know much yet about which ones are the essential ones and how all of these interact," Tschop says... Obestatin and ghrelin share the same gene. Removing that gene pretty much amounts to a draw. "This might explain why a mouse that's lacking that one gene doesn't seem to be very different from a normal mouse, because you remove at the same time, so to speak, the gas pedal and the brake," says Tschop."
Concluding, is Hsueh the only responsible to deceive the general public by exaggerating Darwin in molecular biology? No, unfortunately not... that seems to be the common "mark" of the current beast of atheism through evolutionism started in biology by Darwin.

Expedition Everest Uncovers New Varieties of Animals

Sampling of the outlandish critters:

Giant hornets so deadly locals call them "Yak Killers"

Jumping "Yeti" mice

A new grasshopper in which the males hitch piggy-back rides on the females

Baby blue-faced golden monkeys, the region's largest primates

Hamster-like pikas that eat their own feces

Ten new ants to add the more than 11,000 already known... plus a couple of new frogs, eight new insects, etc...

Intelligent Design: Genibo, A Robotic Dog

S. Korea develops robotic dog 'Genibo'

Koreans unveil speech-recognising digital doggie

Korean Robots Jupiter, Nettoro, Roboid and Genibo Coming This October

Previous Robot:
The Intelligent Design of a Robotic Coelacanth

Tuesday, April 25, 2006

The Intelligent Design... Of Mound Mountains With Pyramids Inside


(Courtesy of Unjournaled! by Dino Avdibeg from Denmark)

Pyramid found - in the heart of Bosnia!! (Thursday, October 27, 2005)

Of it, 'digger' Slowspin wrote, 180 days ago (with 82 comments, to date):
"The pyramid is 100 metres high and there is evidence that it contains rooms and a monumental causeway... The plateau is built of stone blocks, which indicates the presence at the time of a highly developed civilisation."
The media, never up-to-date, just presented it the next way: Bosnian Town Hopes to Cash in on Pyramid. VISOKO, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Apr. 11, 2006 (CBS News.)

My Comment: When the Conquerors from Spain arrived to Mexico, the natives covered many of their Pyramids with stones and soil... so many of them also remain uncoverend 'till this day, looking something like:

Future holds a great future for ID researchers, most abundantly, in Central and South America, I think... so, ID can help in archaeology. Meanwhile, this work in Bosnia is amazing!

History-laden hill contains human-made tunnels, researchers say

For the last link, Zogger wrote:
"Researchers have started exploration into an elaborate underground tunnel structure found under a large hill in Bosnia. The quite regular shape of the small mountain combined with the discoveries and the old legends that go with the place have lead some to speculate it might be the first true man made pyramid found in Europe. Aerial remote sensing has located two other potential pyramids in the same area."
Many more amazing related pictures can be found at Google Images.

The Exquisite Intelligent Design of Those Petite Organs!

... Like that beautiful little toe that screams to the evolutionists, PLEASE:(smile, courtesy of "The Texture of America!")

Finding inspired by the writings of Breslin83 in his Intelligent Criticism Blogspot, as well as by his posted link on the writings of Dr. Giovanni J.R. Calla. So, here we are going to be "Understanding the Functional Relevance of the Once Thought Vestigial Organs":

The Changing Definition of the Thymus from a Believed Rudiment into One of the Most Important Organs in the Human Anatomy
http://www.geocities.com/gcalla1/thymus.htm

The Operative Significance Of The Appendix In Normal Systemic Functions
http://www.geocities.com/gcalla1/appendix.htm

Understanding the Functional Significance of the Once Thought Vestigial Tonsils
http://www.geocities.com/gcalla1/tonsils.htm

The Operative Significance of the Supposed Rudimentary Coccygeal Process
http://www.geocities.com/gcalla1/coccyx.htm

The Actual Significance of the Assumed “Junk” Deoxyribonucleic Acid
http://www.geocities.com/gcalla1/junkDNA.htm

In Breslin83's original posting on Vestigial Organs: A Vestige Of Outdated Science. Series of Essays: Part 1: Humans, we read the next:
"One of the 180 odd vestigial organs alluded to at the Scopes trial: The Appendix does indeed have a function..."
While Dr. Giovanni wrote:
"Initially, there was believed to have been at least 180 rudimentary or vestigial organs in the human body. However, this count has dwindled to approximately 14 structures. These structures are as follows: the adenoids, the APPENDIX, body hair, the COCCYX, the ear muscles, the little toe, the nictitating membrane of the eye, the nipples on males, the nodes on the ears, the parathyroid, the pineal gland, the thymus, the TONSILS, and lastly, the wisdom teeth... some relatively larger animals that are evolutionary linked to the hominid species do not have such vestigial organs at all and yet are perceived to be less developed (evolutionarily speaking) than the presently remaining representative of the order hominidae. Furthermore, some smaller animals that are also believed to be related to the above larger mammals do carry most if not all the said vestigial organs. Thus, upon reviewing this idea, there is therefore no logical pattern in the supposed eventual disappearance of these structures in more advanced organisms... Thus, through many separate research studies and experimentations, most if not all allegedly useless structures in the body are now found to have different tasks and serve extremely important purposes in the body on either insuring over-all structural stability or the assurance of appropriate processing of various internal functions."
Not to subestimate the aesthetic and spatially vital importance and beauty of such "petite organs"!

So, my very dear reader, please don't let those atheistic evolutionists and those living fossils of darwinism to cut off your own and beautiful little toes!

http://gorgeousfeet.textamerica.com/?r=3799050 (Quick time viedo of a gorgeous female little toe, courtesy of Gorgeous Feet, smile)

Or even the worst, please don't let those atheistic evolutionists and those living fossils of darwinism to slander you and to cut out your OWN SOUL!!!

In brief, don't let'em fools fool you anymore!

Monday, April 24, 2006

Intelligent Design In Cryptography: The Enigma Encryption Machine

Enigma machine's products decrypted by TICOM (Target Intelligence Committee).

Lönnig wrote:
"...Dembski has proposed and elaborated the term “specified complexity” by incorporating five main factors to guarantee its applicability not only to diverse human branches of research (e.g. forensic science, cryptography, intellectual property law, random number generation, insurance claim investigation, archaeology, SETI), but also to the origin of species and higher systematic categories..."
To decode a hidden message is as exciting as to interpret a 'new' archaeological puzzling language or to understand the translation of DNA into 'new' Peptides and Modular Proteins!

Related Links:

The United States National Cryptologic Museum (also go there to external links, for example).

Operation Paperclip (a.k.a., Project Paperclip and Operation Overcast)

Operation Alsos (see its missions) and sub-operations: Operation Big and Operation Harborage.

Operation Epsilon

Operation Stella Polaris

Also see in this site:

Decoding Intelligence, Joerg Arnu and Clark

Intelligent Design in Archaeology and in Biology

The Maya and Archaeological Decoding

Common Patterns in the Ancient World, their Pyramids and gods

Three Rivers and Six Fingers Thrice

Friday, April 21, 2006

Science Magazine Publishes a Paper to Oppose Irreducible Complexity (IC)

Long time ago I wrote that the materialists controlling science were in so an extreme paranoia that they will allow the publication of any article to oppose Intelligent Design, no matter how biased it should be.

Naturalistic philosophers in control of the current mainstream science journals are using the "ill-oriented philosophy" of publishing anything opposing Intelligent Design (ID) while at the same time blocking the publication of articles supportive of ID.

Originally I wrote what 'Science' is now confirming [Re: Wall St Journal on Rick Sternberg. 02/01/05]:
"...to write peer-reviewed papers to refute Intelligent Design and Creationism without having allowed BEFORE the publication of any Intelligent Design or Creationism peer-reviewed paper, is an inexcusable shame for the scientific community of today!"

Is the next scenario evidence of soundness of mind or rather reflects the pathology of evolutionism?

1- The logic of the scientific community of today is that "To publish peer-reviewed articles on "Intelligent Design" or on "Creationism" is forbidden, because both are against 'the soundness of science.' However, to publish peer-reviewed articles against "Intelligent Design" or against "Creationism" is, oh yes, that is "very scientific", and is allowed, indeed, encouraged!"

2- "Intelligent Design" is not science; however, to beat "Intelligent Design" is science indeed.

3- You are forbidden to publish in indexed journals your experimental results, theories and observations based on "Intelligent Design", but you are encouraged to publish anything you want against "Intelligent Design".

That is how the scientific community and the establishment are infested today with the pathological state of mind of evolutionism/darwinism!"
Then, I concluded:
"...I dream in a time in which you could be able to freely do good research, and publish it, no matter if you deeply reject the materialistic and biased assumptions, or I must say "impositions" of current evolutionism and darwinism."
Well, now Science magazine has joined such irrational flock of publishing opposition to ID before the publishing of any peer-review supporting ID. So, Who are those atheist authors and publishers fighting against? Are they fighting a ‘non-existing’ concept in their peer-reviewed journals? A concept (IC) published in a book (Behe's 'Black Box') that is so important to the real science that in order to oppose it, the "God-is-not-allowed" establishment 'escalates it' [IC] to the foremost 'prestigious' scientific journal on earth? Once more, the atheistic paranoia has 'escalated' to the point of confirming that for them, "beating ID is 'science' but supporting ID is 'not science at all'..."

So, did 'Science' published a paper on micro-evo to try to endorse macro-evo, or what...? If that's the case, that's just Darwinism at its very beast! (smile)

Let's check the facts to see how the IC and ID microevolutionary fact of antibiotic resistance-like modifications is now being 'ill-used' by evolutionists to try to oppose IC... Debating a controversy that 'does not exist' according to the outdated NCSE and its blind flocks at the AAAS, at the Smithsonian, etc... (including those atheists at National Geographic, at Scientific American, etc.)

On reviewing the case, Denyse O'Leary wrote: "Science and other sci mags are trying to take out intelligent design by flogging up a study that they claim disproves the ID concept of irreducible complexity [Dr. M. Behe's proposal]."

Dr. Michael Behe, the ID concept's author, has replied, of course with his article entitled: "The lamest attempt yet to answer the challenge Irreducible Complexity poses for Darwinian evolution."

Here are some of those comments by Dr. Behe:
"The authors [Jamie Bridgham, Sean Carroll and Joe Thornton, including Christoph Adami in his commentary] are conveniently defining “irreducible complexity” way, way down. I certainly would not classify their system as IC. The IC systems I discussed in Darwin’s Black Box contain multiple, active protein factors. Their “system”, on the other hand, consists of just a single protein and its ligand. Although in nature the receptor and ligand are part of a larger system that does have a biological function, the piece of that larger system they pick out does not do anything by itself. In other words, the isolated components they work on are not irreducibly complex... In the experiment just two amino acid residues were changed! No new components were added, no old components were taken away... Nothing new was produced in the experiment; rather, the pre-existing ability of the protein to bind several molecules was simply weakened. The workers begin their experiments with a protein that can strongly bind several, structurally-very-similar steroids, and they end with a protein that at best binds some of the steroids ten-fold more weakly... Such results are not different from the development of antibiotic resistance, where single amino acid changes can cause the binding of a toxin to a particular protein to decrease (for example, warfarin resistance in rats, and resistance to various AIDS drugs). Intelligent design proponents happily agree that such tiny changes can be accomplished by random mutation and natural selection.... Although the authors imply (and Adami claims directly) that the mutated protein is specific for cortisol, in fact it also binds aldosterone with about half of the affinity. (Compare the red and green curves in the lower right hand graph of [their article's] Figure 4C.) What’s more, there actually is a much larger difference (about thirty-fold) in binding affinity for aldosterone and cortisol with the beginning, ancestral protein than for the final, mutated protein (about two-fold). So the protein’s ability to discriminate between the two ligands has decreased by ten-fold... One would think that the hundred-fold decrease in the ability to bind a steroid would at least initially be a very detrimental change that would be weeded out by natural selection. The authors do not test for that; they simply assume it wouldn’t be a problem, or that the problem could somehow be easily overcome. Nor do they test their speculation that DOC [11-deoxycorticosterone] could somehow act as an intermediate ligand. In other words, in typical Darwinian fashion the authors pass over with their imaginations what in reality would very likely be serious biological difficulties... The fact that such very modest results are ballyhooed owes more, I strongly suspect, to the antipathy that many scientists feel toward ID than to the intrinsic value of the experiment itself... In conclusion, the results (and even the imagined-but-problematic scenario) are well within what an ID proponent already would think Darwinian processes could do, so they won’t affect our evaluation of the science. But it’s nice to know that Science magazine is thinking about us!"
Update:

On April 20, 2006, at 09:20 AM, Bruce Chapman Posted:
Now That Science Magazine Recognizes That Behe's Theory of Irreducible Complexity Is Science, Will They Let Him Respond?
The contention that biochemist Michael Behe's intelligent design argument of "irreducible complexity" (IC) is not science was undercut in a recent issue of Science magazine which contains a paper purporting to falsify the theory.

If it's not science, why bother to try to falsify it? Further, the hapless case made against Behe’s theory--as Dr. Behe explains in his detailed response--shows that irreducible complexity is also good science.

Unintentionally, this paper in Science puts the lie to the whole line used in the Dover trial against Behe and his theory of irreducible complexity. It will be interesting to see whether Science lets Behe reply to the Thornton paper in its pages.

If you can't find it [Behe's Response Printed] in Science, you can read it elsewhere [i.e., Previous Link]. Here's a page with links to several articles about irreducible complexity.
Also see that the deceptive nature of such paper published in Science used a "Step One. Find something that is not irreducibly complex, and explain that, sort of". Also see Paul Nelson's "Debating the Controversy That Doesn't Exist" (smile)